top of page
Search

Fake Job Openings, Fake Resumes, and the Truth About Today's Hiring Process: It's a Two-Way Street.

Oct 14
10 min read

Employers aren't always actively hiring. Candidates aren't always who their resumes say they are. And in a job market driven by online applications, mass messaging, and automated platforms, both sides need to do their homework.



By now, most people know that not every job posting represents an active opening and not every employment opportunity advertised online is legitimate. But there is another side of the conversation that doesn't get discussed nearly enough: candidates and their resumes can be misleading, too.


The hiring process works both ways. Employers need to be honest about their openings, expectations, and hiring intentions. Candidates need to be honest about their experience, qualifications, employment history, and interest in the position.


As a Wisconsin recruiter and business owner working with employers across the state, I've seen firsthand why it is important to look beyond a job posting or a resume. There is much more happening behind the scenes than most people realize.


Let's talk about what job seekers and employers should know, how to protect themselves, and why a little due diligence on both sides can make a significant difference.


Not Every Job Posting Tells the Whole Story

There is a difference between a legitimate job opening, an inactive posting, a misleading advertisement, and an outright scam.


Real job openings

An employer has a genuine business need and intends to consider qualified candidates. The position may be new, the result of company growth, or a replacement for an employee who has left.


Inactive or outdated postings

Sometimes a position has been filled, hiring has been paused, or the employer is gathering resumes for future consideration.


There is another practical consideration: employers pay to advertise jobs. If a posting has already been paid for, they may allow it to run its course rather than manually remove it the moment a position is filled. Updating a company's website or every job board can also take time, particularly when the business does not have a dedicated recruiting department.


The same situation happens with candidate resumes. An employer may pay to access a resume database like Indeed or contact candidates, only to discover that someone has already accepted another position.


Neither situation automatically means someone is being dishonest. Sometimes, the information simply hasn't been updated.


Misleading job postings

Some job advertisements lack detail, have broad qualifications, or appear repeatedly. That can be frustrating for candidates, but there may be reasonable explanations.


An employer might have multiple openings under the same job title, be open to different experience levels, or need help defining the position. A recruiter may also be working with several employers hiring for similar roles.


For example, when I speak with a candidate, I may discover that their background fits more than one position. Rather than limiting the conversation to one job description, I can explore which opportunities best match their experience, compensation expectations, commute, and career goals.


The important thing is to ask questions and determine whether the opportunity makes sense before investing more time. And we go over all that in detail. Your success and longer employment matters to me.


Employment scams

This is where caution becomes especially important. Fraudulent postings may impersonate legitimate companies, promise unrealistic earnings, or attempt to obtain money or sensitive personal information.


A professional-looking advertisement, recognizable company logo, or convincing email does not guarantee that the opportunity is legitimate.


Candidates and Resumes Can Be Misleading, Too

Now let's look at the other side.


Employers and recruiters spend considerable time reviewing resumes, contacting applicants, screening candidates, coordinating interviews, and determining whether someone is genuinely qualified for a position.


Unfortunately, not every resume accurately represents the person behind it.


Some candidates exaggerate their experience, inflate their job titles, misrepresent their responsibilities, or list skills they cannot demonstrate.


Others may provide inaccurate employment dates, claim certifications they do not hold, or submit resumes that have been altered or fabricated with AI.


There are also candidates who apply for positions despite lacking several essential qualifications, without understanding the role or having a realistic interest in the work.


Online job platforms have made it easier than ever to submit resumes to numerous employers with a few clicks. That convenience can be helpful when candidates are targeting appropriate positions. But mass applying to jobs without reviewing the requirements can create a tremendous amount of work for employers and recruiters.


A resume that looks impressive on a screen does not necessarily translate into the experience, skills, or reliability an employer needs.


Just as candidates deserve protection from fake job postings, employers deserve protection from fraudulent applications and misrepresented qualifications.

This is why screening matters. A conversation can reveal things that a resume cannot, including a candidate's actual experience, reasons for making a change, expectations, and whether the opportunity is a realistic fit.


The goal should not be to send or receive the largest number of resumes. The goal should be to identify the right people for the right positions.


Warning Signs Job Seekers Should Watch For

When considering a job opportunity, pay attention to the details.

  • You never applied. Someone unexpectedly contacts you with an interview invitation or job offer for a position you do not remember pursuing.

  • The email address seems suspicious. The sender uses an address that imitates a real company or cannot establish a legitimate connection to the employer.

  • The communication feels unusual. Messages contain questionable spelling, inconsistent company information, or generic greetings that do not fit the circumstances.

  • The interview process cannot be verified. You are asked to communicate exclusively through suspicious messaging accounts or are offered a job without a meaningful discussion of your qualifications.

  • You are asked for money. You are told to purchase equipment through a specified vendor, pay an upfront fee, deposit a check, or transfer money to someone else.

  • You are pressured to provide sensitive information. Someone requests banking credentials, Social Security information, or identity documents before you have verified the employer and the legitimacy of the request.


Email spoofing is another concern. Scammers can manipulate sender information to make messages appear to originate from a legitimate person or organization.


Do not rely solely on the name displayed in an email. Check the full sender address and verify the company independently.


Work-from-home opportunities deserve the same scrutiny. Remote work is legitimate in many industries, but promises of guaranteed income, unusually high pay for little work, or easy money in exchange for an upfront investment should raise concerns.


Most employers want to speak with candidates before making a hiring decision. An in-person interview is common, although legitimate employers also conduct video interviews and remote hiring. The format alone does not determine whether an opportunity is real.


Warning Signs Employers and Recruiters Should Watch For

Candidates are not the only ones who need to exercise caution.

Employers should also recognize when an applicant's information or behavior deserves further review.


Potential warning signs include:

  • Employment history that cannot be verified or contains unexplained inconsistencies.

  • Skills or certifications that do not match what the candidate can demonstrate.

  • Job titles or responsibilities that appear inconsistent with the candidate's actual experience.

  • A resume that appears tailored to every requirement but lacks specific examples of relevant work.

  • Candidates who apply for positions without understanding the job, compensation, schedule, location, or required qualifications.

  • Repeated applications that contain conflicting employment dates, credentials, or contact information.

  • Applicants who avoid reasonable questions about their experience or refuse appropriate verification.


None of these signs automatically proves dishonesty. Resumes can be outdated, job titles vary between companies, and qualified people do not always communicate their experience perfectly.


That is why employers should ask thoughtful questions rather than jump to conclusions.

Verify important qualifications when appropriate, conduct relevant reference checks, and use consistent screening practices. Give candidates a fair opportunity to explain their backgrounds, but do not overlook significant discrepancies.


Employers should also make sure their own job descriptions are accurate, compensation ranges are realistic, and hiring teams understand what they are looking for. Unclear requirements on the employer's side can contribute to unqualified applications on the candidate's side.


Why Some Job Openings Are Confidential

One question candidates sometimes ask is why a recruiter will not disclose the employer's name immediately.


There can be legitimate business reasons for a confidential search. An employer may not want to announce a replacement before communicating internally, may be protecting sensitive business information, or may want to manage the flow of applications.


Some employers also choose not to advertise publicly because they receive overwhelming numbers of resumes, including applications from people who do not meet the basic qualifications.


This can be especially challenging for smaller businesses that do not have a full-time recruiting team.


In my recruiting process, I screen candidates before moving forward with an employer introduction. Once we have discussed the opportunity and confirmed mutual interest, I coordinate the next steps and you will always, always, always get the company name along with a detailed email about the employer and job details for review.


The purpose is not to keep candidates in the dark. It is to protect the process, prepare candidates properly, and ensure that the employer and candidate have a reasonable basis for moving forward.


Candidates should still be able to ask meaningful questions about the position, including responsibilities, compensation, location, schedule, and expectations. Confidentiality should not prevent a candidate from determining whether an opportunity is worth pursuing.


Why Some Resumes Are Not Enough

A resume is a starting point, not a complete assessment of a candidate.


Two people can have similar resumes but very different levels of experience, communication skills, motivation, and expectations.


One candidate may have performed a particular task for ten years. Another may have only limited exposure to it. Both might list the same skill on paper, but the depth of their knowledge can be very different.


Recruiters and employers need to understand what candidates have actually done, what they want to do next, and whether the opportunity aligns with their expectations. Also, as important, what a candidate does not want moving forward. This conversation requires a one on one interaction.


Compensation is another important factor. A candidate may be qualified but unwilling to accept the offered salary. Another may be interested in the position but unable to accommodate the schedule, travel, benefits, or commute.


Those are not necessarily problems with either party. They are reasons to have an honest conversation early in the process.


A good screening process helps prevent wasted time and avoids moving candidates forward for opportunities that are unlikely to work.


My job is to get under the hood before a candidate has to schedule an in-person interview while trying to be respectful of their current job and employer. If we can avoid any unnecessary time off in can help reduce stress during the career change process so when you walk into an actual in person job interview we know it's going to be productive.


How Both Sides Can Protect Themselves

For job seekers:

  1. Verify the employer and job posting through independently confirmed contact information.

  2. Research the company and the person contacting you.

  3. Ask whether the position is actively being filled and what the hiring timeline looks like.

  4. Review the job requirements and be honest about your qualifications.

  5. Never pay a recruiter or employer to secure a legitimate job opportunity.

  6. Protect your personal information until the employer and the request have been verified.

  7. Ask questions about compensation, benefits, responsibilities, and the hiring process before committing.


For employers and recruiters:

  1. Confirm that the position is approved and that there is a genuine hiring need.

  2. Keep job descriptions and compensation information as accurate as possible.

  3. Be transparent with candidates about the opportunity and the process, while respecting legitimate confidentiality requirements.

  4. Screen applicants for relevant experience rather than relying solely on keywords or job titles.

  5. Verify important credentials and employment information when appropriate.

  6. Ask candidates to explain their experience and provide specific examples.

  7. Communicate changes to the hiring process when possible and respect the time candidates invest.


Both sides should also use reasonable judgment when researching each other online. Public information can help establish credibility, but it should not replace fair screening, direct communication, and appropriate verification.


A Note About Working With a Recruiter

A professional recruiter should be able to explain how they work, what type of employment they offer, and what candidates can expect throughout the process.


For example, Wisconsin Country Staffing & Recruiting (WCSR) focuses on direct-hire opportunities. That means the employer hires the candidate directly rather than bringing the candidate on as a temporary employee through the recruiting firm.


My role is to understand both sides, screen candidates, discuss expectations, and help determine whether there is a realistic match before moving forward.


Some of my openings are confidential. Others may be advertised publicly. Regardless, my goal is to work with legitimate employers and candidates whose expectations and qualifications align.


WCSR does not charge candidates a placement fee. Candidates should be cautious of anyone claiming to represent a recruiting firm who asks them to pay money to obtain a job.

Because scammers can impersonate real businesses, always verify that you are communicating with the actual recruiter or company. If you have concerns about a message claiming to come from WCSR, contact the business through independently verified contact information.


What If You Suspect a Fake Posting or Resume?

If you are a candidate who suspects a job posting is fraudulent, stop before sending money or personal information. Contact the employer through verified channels, report the posting to the job board, and report suspected fraud to the Federal Trade Commission at ReportFraud.ftc.gov.


If you are an employer who suspects a fraudulent resume, document the inconsistencies, ask the candidate for clarification, and verify relevant credentials or employment history through appropriate channels. Avoid making assumptions based on a single discrepancy.


If sensitive information has been exposed, take the appropriate steps to protect financial accounts and personal identity information.


The objective is to establish the facts, protect everyone involved, and avoid making decisions based on unverified claims.


The Bottom Line: It's a Two-Way Street

The hiring process is not simply about employers finding candidates or candidates finding jobs. It is about two parties deciding whether they can build a successful working relationship.


Candidates deserve legitimate opportunities, honest communication, reasonable expectations, and respect for their time.


Employers deserve qualified applicants, accurate resumes, genuine interest, and respect for the time and resources required to hire the right person.


Recruiters sit in the middle of that process, working to establish trust, identify potential concerns, and determine whether the match makes sense before everyone invests more time.


Not every inactive job posting is a scam. Not every vague job description is misleading. Not every resume discrepancy means a candidate is dishonest. And not every unsuccessful placement means someone failed to do their job.


But when either side misrepresents information, fails to communicate, or skips reasonable due diligence, the risk of a poor outcome increases.


The answer is not to distrust everyone. It is to verify, communicate, ask questions, and take responsibility for your side of the process.


A successful hire starts long before the offer letter. It starts when employers and candidates are honest about what they need, what they bring to the table, and what they expect from one another.


Because in the end, the goal is not simply to fill a position or land a job.

The goal is to make the right match—for both sides.


For further questions please contact me directly and confidentially at:


Thank you,

Keri, Owner

WCSR

*Since 2016

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page